|
|
Post by browning204 on Mar 16, 2007 1:38:03 GMT
I am on the fence on what my next rifle will be chambered in.
Should I go .243 or 22/250?
Do you guys think the 22/250 is to much of a long range gun for around here??
Any opinions would help.
|
|
|
|
Post by FirePirate on Mar 16, 2007 2:21:03 GMT
I have a .22-250 and got my fox with it. I actually got it for p-dog shooting, but now that i live back east i still shoot it. I love it and it'll shoot 1 hole groups at 100 yards all day. I think you'd be happy with either.
|
|
vic
Egg
Posts: 8
|
Post by vic on Mar 16, 2007 13:21:51 GMT
Mike if it helps, I have 22 250 dies and cases. I do not have 243
|
|
|
|
Post by usmchuck on Oct 11, 2007 0:58:52 GMT
I personally would go with the .243 just because it is so versitile. if you want to hunt deer just run a heavier round if your more into yotes and other vermin then use a lighter round.
|
|
|
|
Post by omega47 on Nov 14, 2007 2:34:08 GMT
I've got several Rem 700 ADL in .243. I like them because of the versatility. I can use 62gr Barnes VG for varmints or heavier Remington Core-Lokt loads for deer, pig or even bear. When I'm in TX at my sister's coyote hunting, I keep a couple Core-Lokt rounds in my pocket in case a pack of pigs happens to wander by. Then it's BBQ time.
Still - wouldn't mind trading one for a .22-250. Nice to have a variety of guns to play with.
|
|
|
|
Post by MK-M-GOBL on Nov 14, 2007 15:41:07 GMT
I'd have to go with the 243 like omega47 & usmchuck. OI believe you would get a lot more all around use with the 243 than the 22-250 here in the NE states.
|
|
|
|
Post by browning204 on Nov 14, 2007 15:54:11 GMT
I agree, the .243 will be my next.
|
|
